Have you ever read a book by an author you usually enjoy, only to find yourself getting increasingly irritated as you turn the pages?
Yeah. That was me recently.
I just finished a book by an author whose work I’ve enjoyed in the past. The premise was good. The storyline had potential. There was enough there to make it a suspenseful, engaging read.
But the execution? That’s where things went wrong.
And as both a reader and an editor, I couldn’t help noticing the things that kept pulling me out of the story.
One of my biggest frustrations was the sheer number of characters introduced within individual chapters.
At one point, there were approximately six different characters and storylines being juggled in a single chapter, with nothing more than a space between each section to signal the shift.
Now, I’m all for multiple points of view. When done well, they can add depth, build suspense, and give readers information they wouldn’t otherwise have. But there needs to be a clear structure.
When you’re bouncing between six characters in one chapter, readers have to work harder to keep track of who’s who, where they are, and why their scenes matter.
My suggestion? Consider giving each character or storyline its own chapter, particularly when the perspectives are substantially different. If shorter sections are necessary, make those transitions clear and purposeful.
The goal is to keep readers immersed in the story, not make them stop and mentally reorganize everything they just read.
I figured it out, of course. But I shouldn’t have to work that hard to follow a story that could have been much more suspenseful with a little restructuring.
Instead of feeling eager to turn the page, I found myself getting bored and, honestly, annoyed.
The other issue was the amount of unnecessary backstory.
There was a character whose involvement in the main plot was relevant, but the author spent pages discussing her in-laws, how she and her husband met, and the personal issues they were dealing with at the time.
And I kept asking myself one question: What does any of this have to do with the story?
Backstory can be wonderful. It helps readers understand a character’s motivations, relationships, and decisions. It can even become an important part of the mystery itself.
But there’s a difference between developing a character and giving readers a detailed account of every aspect of that character’s life.
If the information doesn’t move the plot forward, reveal something important, build suspense, or deepen our understanding of a character who matters to the story, does the reader really need it? Sometimes, a few well-chosen sentences can accomplish what several pages of exposition cannot.
As writers, we may know everything about our characters. We may know their childhood histories, family dynamics, marriage problems, and what they had for breakfast three Tuesdays ago.
But that doesn’t mean all of it belongs in the manuscript.
Just because you know it doesn’t mean your reader needs to know it.
This is one of the reasons I believe editing is so important.
Editing isn’t just about correcting punctuation, catching typos, or making sure the grammar is right. It’s also about looking at the bigger picture.
Does the story flow? Are the transitions clear? Is the pacing working? Are we giving readers information they need, or are we distracting them with details that don’t serve the story?
Sometimes, a manuscript doesn’t need more words. It needs fewer.
Sometimes, a scene that the author loves needs to be shortened or removed because it doesn’t belong. And sometimes, a good story is hiding underneath too many characters, too much backstory, and a structure that keeps readers from enjoying it.
That’s where a thoughtful edit can make all the difference.
Here’s the funny thing: despite all my complaints, I finished the book.
The storyline really was good. I could see the potential, and I wanted to know how everything turned out. But I also kept thinking about how much more suspenseful and enjoyable the book could have been with some restructuring and tighter editing.
Now, I have two other books by the same author on loan from the library. And I’m seriously reconsidering whether I want to read them. π
Maybe I’ll give them a chance. Maybe they’ll surprise me. After all, I’ve enjoyed some of this author’s other work.
Have you ever read a book with a great storyline that was let down by too many characters, excessive backstory, or choppy transitions? Did you stick with it until the end, or did you give up?
Tell me in the comments. I’d love to hear about your reading experiences!




